User talk:ANGELUS

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ANGELUS.

This is the user talk page of ANGELUS, where you can send messages and comments to ANGELUS.

• Be polite.
• Be friendly.
• Assume good faith.
• No personal attacks.

• Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
• Put new text under old text.
• New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
• Click here to start a new topic.

Welcome

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ANGELUS!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Police ranks

Hi Angelus, thank you for creating images of the Italian Police ranks. It would be greatly appreciated if you could add the ranks below "Vice Commissario" of the following organizations: Polizia di Stato, Polizia Penitenziaria and Corpo Forestale dello Stato. Also, the coat of arms of the CFS would be fine - if you like and if you have time, of course. Thank you! 190.148.217.110 16:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Angelus,

about the ranks of Polizia di Stato, e.g. File:Agente scelto ps.png, you cite as source the website poliziadistato.it. However, the website is under a CC-NC-ND license. Could you please clarify wether you created the images from scartch or you uploaded them from the website. In the second case, in my opinion, the images would be a copyvio and should be removed.

Please answer in my talk page.--Japs 88 (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Don Carlo.jpg

When I click on "nominate for deletion" it automatically notifies anyone who has be involved with the photo. I do not know of any way not to notify you since it just does it for me. Sorry to bother you. --Hold and wave (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Confused by an edit

I don't understand the reason for this edit, nor why it's flagged as a minor edit, given that it deletes a substantial amount of information. Not trying to say I dispute the edit, per se- I just honestly don't understand it, especially since the content you deleted had been added automatically by an official Commons tool for dealing with derivative works. Any explanation would be appreciated. Cheers. —Notyourbroom (talk) 02:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Authorship of Logos

Greetings! I would like to clarify that for any company logo you cannot claim authorship since the logo was designed by the company. The fact that you are the uploader of the logo is recorded in the file history. The same applies for a painting in which case the authorship does not change even if it is in the public domain. Hope this makes things clear. --Jovian Eye _talk 02:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Assassin's Creed logo.svg

File:Assassin's Creed logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 09:21, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Assassin's Creed Brotherhood.png

Hi, according to our policies a SVG is not an exact duplicate of a PNG. You cannot uses {duplicate} nor {speedy} for that. Also please don't use both together. Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Giovanni Falcone e Paolo Borsellino

Caro Angelus,

chi e cosa ti fa pensare che questa foto è di dominio pubblico? Innanzitutto se pure fosse da considerare una semplice foto il suo copyright durerebbe 20 anni a partire dal marzo 1992, vera data di realizzazione e non dal 1987 come erroneamente riportato. Ma la verità è che questa non è una "SEMPLICE FOTO". Pertanto il copyright dura 70 anni. Purtroppo quello che ha rovinato il rispetto e la tutela del diritto d'autore è proprio l'uso improprio di internet e la scarsa informazione sulle leggi che lo regolamentano. Ti chiedo pertanto di cancellare la pagina riguardante la foto in questione. Cordiali saluti

Tony Gentile

L'autore della suddetta foto

--Saurovigiani (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Please exercise much more care when marking images as duplicates

Unfortunately for you, File:Fernande vintage nude photo 2.jpg is not the same photo as File:Fernande (vintage nude photo).jpg. Notice how the woman is turned to a different body angle, and has a somewhat different posture? They are photographs from the same session, but they are NOT the same photograph. I'm going to upload higher resolution versions of some of these French postcards, hopefully within the next few days, but in the meantime you should be rather careful in handling cases of claimed duplicate images... AnonMoos (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

@AnonMoos - First of all, please do not use CAPS in my talk page! Btw, do you have vision problems? I have reported as duplicates these two photos:

• Fernande vintage nude photo 2.jpg
• Fernande (vintage nude photo) 2.jpg

Even a blind man would see that it's the same image! Next time please be careful before making wrong observations! Angelus^(talk) 13:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm very sorry I made a mistake. I was confused by the uploading of images with names very similar to other existing images (differing only by whether or not parentheses were present in the name). I'm going to upload higher-resolution versions of the JA40's shortly... AnonMoos (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

You're now a filemover

Hi ANGELUS, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
• Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
• For guideline when to rename a file, please see here. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 00:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Grazie

Grazie mille per la proposta che hai fatto...ti ringrazio infinitamente. Io qui su commons ci capisco poco-nula delle regole e delle varie cose interne...mi limito a caricarci su i file che faccio...però questa "certificazione" non fa che rendermi molto orgoglioso! Grazie ancora! --Gigillo83 (talk) 14:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Giampaolo Di Paola.jpg

File:Giampaolo Di Paola.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.27.139.152 18:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Commons Rollbacker.svg

Hello ANGELUS, can you tell me what happened at File:Commons Rollbacker.svg#filehistory? There should be three file versions and the page versions which are here. A mistake? Or do I oversee something? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Simply I renamed this file, then I changed my mind and I reuploaded it with the old name and marked the other version with {{Bad name}}. ;-)

Greetings. Angelus^(talk) 03:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi again, aaah - I should better watch the dates. ;) ... and you should not mess around! :P

Okay, then the older two file versions are would be deleted - aren't they needed anymore? Maybe place a note/link on the bad name file page to this section for explanation. Going to bed now. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done I placed a link! ;-) However no, they aren't needed anymore. Good night! :-) Angelus^(talk) 04:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Moe Epsilon

Thanks for watching out for my talk page, but it was me who added that, browser logged me out when I left for en.wiki. :p — Moe ε 10:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

No inconvenience at all :p — Moe ε 05:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Template

Ciao. Ho provato ma non sono riuscito a sistemarlo. Probabilmente manca una class.css che rende quei link "ad aggiornamento" e non come collegamenti, ma non ho idea quale sia. Non so, forse potresti provare a usare il layout di un altro template, tipo Template:Welcome/layout, facendo un po' di adattamenti... Mi spiace--Trixt (talk) 10:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

IP comment

Hi ANGELUS, are you really sure that it was vandalism? --Túrelio (talk) 17:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg

The thumb of File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg looks smaller than the images it's next to, at COM:ICON. Any idea why? And there was already File:Admin mop.svg - why is the new version better?

On a related note, if you look at COM:ICON you'll see there's no Commons bureaucrat icon, and it shouldn't be hard to make one using the SVG tool of the Wikipedia bureaucrat icon, and the Commons SVG logo. That would be nice to have. cheers, Rd232 (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

The thumb was smaller than the images it's next to, due to a problem of proportions. The mop was too long compared to the Wikipedia logo. However, I fixed the problem.

Anyway the new image is better because it has less weight and better proportions.

About the Commons bureaucrat icon, I have created three different versions:

• Commons Bureaucrat.svg
• Commons Bureaucrat (2).svg
• Commons Bureaucrat (3).svg

Choose the one you prefer. Greetings! Angelus^(talk) 20:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Definitely this one, to match the existing Wikipedia one. My only concern is that as so often the lower-contrast grey Wikipedia logo is easier to adapt for different icons, especially at low sizes. I'm not sure if there's anything that can be done to tweak this, like maybe lighten the Commons logo for the smaller size (needed for {{Bureaucrat}})? Rd232 (talk) 07:34, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately there is not much to do for tweak this. This is why I created the other two icons, because at low sizes they are clearer and less confused. Angelus^(talk) 19:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

I don't know, those alternate versions don't seem any better at small sizes. Is it possible that moving the tool icon up within the SVG would help, so that it overlaps the top of the Commons icon instead of the centre of its circle? Rd232 (talk) 14:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi. What are your thoughts on this? Would you have a problem with the image being used as a top icon, even when it does not link to the image description page? -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 21:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Flag

Ciao. Va bene, buon lavoro.--Trixt (talk) 20:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hello, ANGELUS. You have new messages at Trappedinburnley's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CPA catalogue gallery

Please, do not revert, when images are moved from the page Файлы из категории Stamps of the Soviet Union не попавшие в галерею каталога ЦФА into the page like Каталог ЦФА (4001-5000), because the former is created for the purpose of the identification of stamps in it and moving them into pages like the latter. This is stated in the header of the first page I'm talking about (although the statement is in Russian, you can use Google Translate or something like that to translate it into another language). 79.132.171.215 21:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Pyranoscope shoot.gif‎

I do not understand your edits on this file. Why do you delete several valid Categories and insert a single nonexistent one instead? You have realized that it is an (large) animation consisting of 25 frames? Greetings Jahobr (talk) 00:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

I removed the categories because, frankly, when I see the image, in the file description page, it seems not to move and it seems static. Greetings. Angelus^(talk) 15:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Glaciar Perito Moreno8 - Argentina.JPG

Hello, just coming to say: Thank you for the new version! Poco a poco (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

A talkback from ain92

Hello, ANGELUS. You have new messages at Ain92's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Incubator logo and mop

Hi, Can you help me create a sysop logo and bureaucrat logo for Wikimedia Incubator such as you did at Wikimedia Commons. Source Kindly regards. --Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 16:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Here are the logos:

• Incubator Administrator.svg
• Incubator Bureaucrat.svg

I hope they go well! Let me know. ;-) Greetings. Angelus^(talk) 17:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! --Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 19:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

{{User talk}}

Hello, I saw your request in Jebulon´s talk page, so -after helping him out- I took care of the Spanish version: see Template:User talk/es cheers, Poco a poco (talk) 22:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Template:User talk/fr. Could you please check if i didn't make mistakes ? Thanks a lot.--Jebulon (talk) 23:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! General Bonaparte giving orders at the Battle of Lodi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photograph that portrays, with an excellent quality, a painting with an important historical value.--IlSistemone 01:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of the House of Gelmini 2.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice & good quality.--IlSistemone 01:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:The O'Rahilly Ballylongford3.jpg

Hi, I'm from en.wiki; I was wondering if you could help me correcting the name of a file? File:The O'Rahilly Ballylongford3.jpg is an old version of File:The O'Rahilly Ballylongford3 (1).jpg that has not been corrected (you can see that it is a little bit tilted compared to the image with (1) in the name). I don't have move or renaming privileges, so I can't correct this on my own. Can you move File:The O'Rahilly Ballylongford3 (1).jpg to File:The O'Rahilly Ballylongford3.jpg? Premeditated Chaos (talk) 03:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Your questions about your pictures in VIC

Hi dear ANGELUS,

Your pictures of De Gasperi and Gambino (both italian politicians, lol) are fine, no problem. But you're now going to experience the qualities of some of our friends. Especially one of them think that "galleries" are essential, and "opposes" (or at least recently "discuss") if any picture candidate has no "gallery". Many of us think he is wrong, and we have a lot of disagreements about this, and about what is (or must be) a  Oppose. If you read comments all around your pictures, I'm sure you'll understand the problem. He changes some scopes by himself, without giving apparently information to the author, in the case of your pictures . I personally think there is no need of galleries, there is a discussion about that, maybe could you participate, as you are involved. Please have a look to the Valued Images Guidelines too, it is interesting. --Jebulon (talk) 13:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, me again.

Since my message above, I've changed my opinion about galleries, because of wise arguments of User:Slaunger (He is one of the creators of the VI project, and he knows very well what he is talking about). Answering your question ? because of the bot, I suppose... Well, in case of galleries, the bot tags automatically the picture with the , but not if we have only a category. Therefore, I think, maybe WS was not wrong, but I disagree with his way to do, because for the current rules, there is no mandatory for a gallery, and then, 1) "no gallery" is not a valuable reason for an opposition, 2) nobody has the right to change the scope I have chosen, except myself. Cheers.--Jebulon (talk) 17:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

for all your good contribs. Commons can be happy to have such a contributor. -- RE rillke questions? 15:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Alcide de Gasperi.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alcide De Gasperi, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is better to make a connection to the scope of the category. If you want to make a link to an article done in the "reason".

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment - Ok, thank you for the suggestion. Angelus ^(talk) 14:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't think a subscope is warranted here. พ.s. 22:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Question What does it means??? And please, next time, you don't have to change the scope removing the category that I entered! Angelus ^(talk) 23:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlo Gambino, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Geocoding is needed. Yann (talk) 17:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Done --Angelus ^(talk) 17:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best for the scope. Yann (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment The same with the profile, even with a lower resolution, is maybe more illustrative...--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

• The scope that I entered for this photo is "portrait", not "mugshot". ;-) --Angelus ^(talk) 20:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

• OK. ;)---Jebulon (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't think a subscope is warranted here. พ.s. 22:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Question What does it means??? And please, next time, you don't have to change the scope removing the category that I entered! Angelus ^(talk) 23:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Colosseum.svg

Hi Angelus, you have reverted one category of this image. Why do you think that the image Colosseum.svg belongs to the category P icons? In my opinion, P icons includes a style with a special background. Unfortunately, you had reverted without an additional remark. Kind regards -- Con-struct (talk) 15:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

A "P icon" is a "Portal/Project" icon. So all icons that can be used in a portal or in a project, can be included in that category. They must not have a specific style. Cheers. ;-) Angelus^(talk) 15:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Battle of Lodi, painting.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support The nitpicker strikes again: at this time "Napoléon" was only "Bonaparte"...;)--Jebulon (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC) BTW, who took the picture ? we have a mention "own work"...--Jebulon (talk) 18:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
  • I took this picture a few years ago. ;-) Angelus ^(talk) 19:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Please create gallery and link to it in the scope. พ.s. 10:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
  •  Done - But please, next time, do not change the scope that I entered! Angelus ^(talk) 13:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edmond Leboeuf, photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support He was not only General, but Marshall of France.--Jebulon (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Ok, I fixed the description page. ;-) Angelus ^(talk) 14:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
    • But you where not wrong: at the time of the picture, he was only general ! --Jebulon (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donald Duck portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be useful to add "portrait" in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
  
•  Done - Angelus ^(talk) 13:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good, useful, interesting and best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose - not a free file. Please see the extended debate on a similar object at Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Appreciate America. Come On Gang. All Out for Uncle Sam" (Mickey Mouse)" - NARA - 513869.tif. I've nominated the file for deletion. --Claritas (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment - Please, discuss it on the appropriate page! Then, if for any reason, the community will consider your deletion request right, the file will be deleted. For the moment, if you do not have other objections or appropriate motivations, I restore the positive vote. Angelus ^(talk) 21:53, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment - Your negative vote is invalid because here is not the right place to talk about this! Here you just have to assess the value, purpose and usefulness of this image! And if you do not have objections concerning these aspects, your vote is invalid! --Angelus ^(talk) 14:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
• It's perfectly valid. As we're going to delete this file in a few days because it is a copyright violation, making it a valued image is a pointless exercise which will only cause more work when the file is deleted.--Claritas (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
• If the file will be deleted, however would not cause any additional work! Angelus ^(talk) 18:34, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support no problem for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose - not a free file. พ.s. 22:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

• Prove it!!!! --Jebulon (talk) 18:11, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

• Exactly! I agree with Jebulon. Angelus ^(talk) 19:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Yann (talk) 19:59, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I am waiting for the closure of the deletion request for closing this nomination. Yann (talk) 04:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

• Ok thank you! ;-) Angelus ^(talk) 14:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Support No problem to decline it. --Katarighe (Talk) 18:13, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

RfCU

Thank you for your support and kind words.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Icon of Colosseum.svg

File:Icon of Colosseum.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Planimetria Amantea.jpg

File:Planimetria Amantea.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Superman vs Lex Luthor.jpg

File:Superman vs Lex Luthor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Colosseum.svg

File:Colosseum.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Tigranes II the Great.png

File:Tigranes II the Great.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Treaty of Rome.jpg

File:Treaty of Rome.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

PD-Italy

Ciao. Cerco di essere didascalico per non tediarti troppo con discorsi che probabilmente non ti interessano piu' di tanto, quindi se hai qualche dubbio domanda pure nello specifico. Dunque, il template di it.wiki indica la data di creazione perché prende in considerazione la data e il luogo di creazione della fotografia, mentre quello di Commons prende in considerazione la data e il luogo di prima pubblicazione (ci tengo a precisare che attualmente il template di Commons e' comunque incompleto, in quanto chi ha fatto la modifica sulla data di pubblicazione si e' dimenticato di integrarla con l'applicazione della legge anche a opere di autori italiani - l'ha indicato nell'oggetto della modifica ma non nel template). In it.wiki vengono considerati data e luogo di scatto perche' si pensa che l'articolo 92 ("20 anni dalla data di produzione") si applichi a qualunque fotografia basta che sia stata scattata in Italia. In Commons vengono considerati data e luogo di pubblicazione perche' si pensa che sono questi dati, oltre alla nazionalita' dell'autore, che determinano quale legge sul copyright applicare (ce ne sono anche altri di dati da applicare, ma questi tre sono i fondamentali). Ti faccio un esempio pratico per spiegare meglio. Facciamo finta che un francese faccia un viaggio in Italia nel 1990 e fa una fotografa "semplice" ad un albero. Torna in Francia e, nel 2000, pubblica la fotografia su una rivista francese. Nel 2012 un utente vuole caricare la fotografia per visualizzarla in Wikipedia. Riassumendo:

• Data di creazione della fotografia in Italia: 1990
• Data di prima pubblicazione in Francia: 2000
• Data al momento del caricamento: 2012
• Nazionalita' del fotografo: francese

Quale legge sul copyright applicheresti? Quella francese (che non ha eccezione alla regola del "70+morte dell'autore") o quella italiana? Se applicassimo il tag di it.wiki, il file si potrebbe caricare affermando che la fotografia e' stata scattata in Italia e che sono passati venti anni dalla creazione. Su Commons non si potrebbe caricare perche' si applica la legge francese, non quella italiana.--Trixt (talk) 11:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Secondo me la scelta piu' logica e' quella di usare la data e il luogo di prima pubblicazione per determinare quale legge sul copyright si applichi. E' infatti inconcepibile che solamente per il fatto che una fotografia e' stata scattata in un dato luogo si applichino le leggi di quel luogo e non quelle cui e' soggetto il fotografo o quelle del luogo in cui la fotografia viene resa pubblica. Pensa ad esempio se tu dovessi fare un viaggio negli US e tornare in Italia dopo una settimana con le tue fotografie, che pubblichi su Facebook: pensi che sia giusto applicare le leggi degli US (supponendo, cosa che non e', che gli USA abbiano, al pari dell'Italia, una legge che dichiari "statunitense" qualunque foto fatta negli USA) o quelle italiane, cui tu sei soggetto in quanto italiano e che vengono applicate in quanto tu invii le foto dall'Italia? Senza dilungarmi in ulteriori problemi che la cosa comporta, ho sempre pensato che la scelta della data di creazione sia una scelta di comodo per cercare di mantenere il maggior numero di foto possibili a scapito del principio di precauzionalita' e della sicurezza che quelle foto siano veramente utilizzabili per qualunque scopo, non solo quello di Wikipedia (per carita', tutti vogliamo piu' foto possibili ma io voglio che siano veramente libere dal copyright, e non libere perche' "va beh ma e' quasi impossibile che qualcuno ti denunci"), senza contare il campanilismo che porta alcuni a pensare che se una legge italiana stabilisce qualcosa allora non puo' essere che applicata alla lettera, oltre al fatto che "certamente gli stranieri non possono insegnarci come applicare le nostre leggi", figlio del "padroni a casa nostra". Ti lascio un ultimo esempio di quanto la data di creazione sia problematica nell'applicazione.--Trixt (talk) 09:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Li' viene riportato l'esatto termine di legge, che e' appunto 20 anni dalla creazione.--Trixt (talk) 22:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

No, e' che viene riportato l'esatto termine di legge, ma la data e il luogo di prima pubblicazione e' un dato fondamentale per vedere se si applica quella legge italiana.--Trixt (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

E' implicito. Il template e' per fotografie "pubblicate per la prima volta in Italia": vuol dire che se lo applichi devi avere "in mano" il luogo e la data di prima pubblicazione. E successivamente e' ovvio che una fotografia non puo' essere creata dopo che e' stata pubblicata, quindi deve essere stata pubblicata (e quindi creata) piu' di 20 anni fa.--Trixt (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Beh in quel caso entra in gioco un altro articolo di legge che garantisce 25 anni di copyright a chi pubblica per la prima volta una fotografia. Nel template pero' non e' menzionato perche' sono casi meno frequenti.--Trixt (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

La legge garantisce 25 anni di copyright a chi pubblica per la prima volta una fotografia, quindi, oltre a essere stata scattata piu' di 20 anni fa, deve anche essere stata pubblicata piu' di 25 anni fa. Se si applica la semplice regola "20 anni dalla data di pubblicazione" si coprono anche questi casi meno frequenti (c'e' un gap di 5 anni ma penso si possa transcurare per la maggior parte dei casi).--Trixt (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Banner portale storia d'Italia.png

File:Banner portale storia d'Italia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Undoing edits

When you revert someone's edits, can you please make sure you give a reason? That being said, may I know why you reverted my edits here --Sreejith K (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

And when you make a change can you please make sure you give a reason? There is no reason to turn the links provided as a source, in a gallery. Greetings. --Angelus^(talk) 15:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Well, a gallery gives a much better understanding of the images involved. If you want users to click the 15 links and check each image, you are asking for a bit too much. Anyone would prefer to see all the images together, won't they? --Sreejith K (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

First, two images (with free license) were taken from it.Wikipedia and therefore are not visible in the gallery. And then, frankly, this is also a matter of point of view, because I could say that a gallery is too cumbersome, so please, I ask you to leave things as they are. Thanks, cheers. Angelus^(talk) 16:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Cambio nome immagine

Ciao! Adesso vengo a rompere anche qui su Commons... Tu sai come cambiare il nome di questo file File:Collage Aeolie Islands.jpg in File:Sicily Islands.jpg? -- Yiyi (talk) 09:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

ihihih! sai che non l'ho ancora capito? Mi era uscito che serviva quando volevo trasferire un file da Wikipedia a Commons, ma non so a cosa serva :) -- Yiyi (talk) 20:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Italian somaliland COA.svg

Che messaggio di errore ti ha dato la prima volta? Comunque, la versione che appare adesso e' questa: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Italian_somaliland_COA.svg . E' quella corretta? Per la cronologia sbagliata non saprei, potrebbe essere un errore del sistema non piu' correggibile. Comunque, usa {{Retouched}} nella pagina del file per correggere la situazione e indicare con precisione chi ha fatto cosa.--Trixt (talk) 20:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Quella dei server momentaneamente fuori servizio?--Trixt (talk) 20:19, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Purtroppo non si puo' modificare la cronologia, io posso solo eliminare una certa versione o tutto il file (un po' come la cronologia delle voci, l'oggetto una volta postato non si puo; piu; cambiare). Piu' che usare {{Retouched}} nella pagina di descrizione non saprei dove andare a mettere le mani...--Trixt (talk) 20:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

E' un po' un problema perche' il file e' in uso, e le due soluzioni che hai proposto potrebbero creare casini se non si fa tutto in fretta. Secondo me comunque non serve, la cronologia delle versioni e' solo una cosa tecnica, non succede niente anche se non e' perfetta, quello che conta e' l'elenco degli autori indicati nella descrizione. Se vuoi puoi migliorare quello.--Trixt (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Major-General Robert Baden-Powell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good topic. I think the scope name should be: Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell. It should be clear which of Baron Baden-Powell's is this: first, second or third ;) --MrPanyGoff 18:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• At the time, he was not Baron yet, he was just Major-General. He was appointed Baron in 1929. ;-) Angelus^(talk) 18:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• This is an often misunderstanding of the VI project. The scope is not a description of the image!!! The usual mistake here is that people find some good image and start calculating for some scope to fit the image. The encyclopedic knowledge theoretically already have all the scopes and just search for good images for them. Yes, I'm partly agree that there is something in the project that needs improvement. I think that, for now, we search for the best photo of Robert Stephenson Smyth Baden-Powell - so, this is actually the best scope name, imo ;) - no baron, no general, no titles but the full name. Is it ok? --MrPanyGoff 19:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• What are the full names of his sons and grandsons if any?--MrPanyGoff 19:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• Ok. But this is the best photo depicting Robert Baden-Powell as a Major-General, so this is the scope!

• P.S. I did not understand the meaning of the last question. Greetings. Angelus^(talk) 19:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment I would like to say my opinion again. We search for the best depiction of Robert Stephenson Smyth Baden-Powell and this is a good candidate for it. At least, you should remove South Africa from the scope.--MrPanyGoff 17:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
• Ok. ;-) --Angelus^(talk) 11:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Major-General Robert Baden-Powell, in South Africa to Major-General Robert Baden-Powell --Angelus^(talk) 11:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Well, I can accept it now.--MrPanyGoff 16:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 16:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

cancellazione redirect

Ciao Angelus, vorrei chiederti una cosa: come posso cancellare i file-redirect che ho creato? È comunque possibile, dopo che si è cancellato il file, immettere un'immagine con quel nome?--CityClass (talk) 11:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klara Hitler.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best (only) in scope, widely used on WMF projects. cmadler (talk) 16:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Map of the Eurojackpot countries.svg

Hi Angelus,

thank you for correcting the map, but Greenland is not one of the participating countries of Eurojackpot (such as Iceland, Norway and Sweden). --95.112.89.187 02:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC) Petros

Hi, Greenland is a country within the Kingdom of Denmark. The Denmark is a participant of the Eurojackpot. --Angelus^(talk) 12:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Rollback

I don't know who, but it's the one used in most Wikimedia sites, and it was made before your version. The other version, which isn't even mine, exists since 2008. Please stop switching versions, use the most accurate, based on the original PNG design. House (talk) 15:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

It's "coordinated" because that logo is also yours. I agree about the "spirit", but please, please don't make unnecesary changes. It's not the same version, so stop this. I'm not touching YOUR userbox anymore, but please have in mind that your version is not better just because you made it.House (talk) 18:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

And who ruled that? You can't superseed just because it's more "symmetrical", I can simplify the original SVG code. Look, just put it in "Other versions" in the SVG and PNG, but avoid changing the template in the PNG. House (talk) 18:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

It's all good now, peace (: House (talk) 19:08, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Stemmi delle Corpo Nazionale dei Vigili del Fuoco e Corpo forestale dello Stato

Hello

Sorry for being late, yesterday I was trying to upload my latest file when I had problems with it. It was too late and I couldn't answer your request.

I´m really busy with the Spanish military emblems, the Italian military coats of arms are really nice from a heraldic point of view but I just can't afford the time to do it. I recommend you contact User:Adelbrecht. He is really a master heraldic designer. Good luck. --Heralder (talk) 18:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Sinopskiy Battle on the 18th November of the 1853 year (Night after Battle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Is the scope the painting or the battle? For the former, this is the only image we have, so it could be VI if geocoded. For the battle, I am not sure a painting is the best illustration of the event. I would rather promote a map. Anyway, the scope needs to be fixed. Yann (talk) 17:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment - The scope is the painting. The geocoding is already inserted in the {{Institution}} template. Angelus^(talk) 18:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
  • OK, then the scope should be the name of the painting. It seems to be The Sinopskiy Battle on the 18th November of the 1853 year (Night after Battle) [1]. The description should be updated. Yann (talk) 21:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Battle of Sinop, painting to The Sinopskiy Battle on the 18th November of the 1853 year (Night after Battle) --Angelus^(talk) 22:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Done - Greetings. --Angelus^(talk) 22:12, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best for the scope. Yann (talk) 11:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

":" and French

Hi. There should be always be a (non-breaking) space before ":" in French, see Template:fr for instance. I reverted your edit. --Z 20:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

A hand

I will try but I am afraid I cannot guarantee that because there are more coats of arms at the Spanish Armorial and making the military emblems and arms is very slow as you can check at the history of my personal page. Best regards--Heralder (talk) 21:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Request

I will look into your request next month. I'm currently too busy studying, I'm sorry. I hope you understand. Adelbrecht (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

First part of the request is finished, now that I have time again:

• File:Coat of Arms of the Vigili del Fuoco.svg

--Adelbrecht (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

• File:Coat of Arms of the State Forestry Corps.svg

So, that's the second one. Thank you for your patience. :-) Adelbrecht (talk) 16:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Like this? Adelbrecht (talk) 14:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Adelbrecht (talk) 17:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

File:El Taj Mahal-Agra India0023.JPG

Hello Angelus, I saw that you uploaded a new version of this picture on behalf of the graphics workshop in it.wp. Where is the change request? I would like to understand what is the purpose of the modifications. Anyhow, it looks good. For what I can see you replaced the dark areas with black ink, improved the symmetry adding a black frame on the right and whitened the building. Do I miss something? Thanks and regards, Poco a poco (talk) 08:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Heralder Autopatrolled

Thanks you. --Heralder (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Palazzo Pisanelli.jpg

Angelus ti saluto dopo lunghissimo tempo! Vorrei farti presente che questa immagine non è della torre del palazzo Pisanelli (che non esiste) bensì il campanile della chiesa di Regina Coeli! Mi è stato rifiutato il cambio di nome, se questo non dovesse essere ancora avvenuto (ho segnalato la cosa a chi me l'ha rifiutato) potresti ovviare al problema? Grazie!!!--CityClass (talk) 13:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Wiki Loves Monuments Fact Sheet-it.svg

Hello, I restore this file. I kown this is not really good to be shown, but it has the advantage that it could be easily modified by anyone (contrary to the pdf) and translated. As you can see, from the first version of this file, I made the pdf version File:Wiki Loves Monuments Fact Sheet-it.pdf which show nothing wrong. The problem comes from the mediawiki software. If you have the good fonts on the computer there is no worries. Regards, Otourly (talk) 15:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:CERN logo.svg

File:CERN logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 10:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Ribbon bars of the United States

Could you explain me why you remove this category to File:Presidential Medal of Freedom (ribbon).png & File:Presidential Medal of Freedom with Distinction (ribbon).PNG, without any explanation? --Your question on my talk page.

Sure. The files in the category were messy and random, some named in full, such as File:Presidential Medal of Freedom (ribbon), but many with abbreviations that are not immediately understandable, such as File:PA CM, File:Ncagmasr.jpg, or File:Recruiting and Retention Ribbon (what branch of service? what organization?). I endeavored to find out where they belong, and place them. The category Ribbon Bars seems to be treated differently for the US than other countries, who have separate categories for military medals and ribbon bars, while we treat the ribbon representing the medal as if it were one and the same as the medal. I have since created Category:Decrorations of the Office of the President of the United States, with Category:Presidental Medal of Freedom as one of the subcategories. So the ribbon appears both on Category:Presidental Medal of Freedom and Category:Decrorations of the Office of the President of the United States (which leads to Category:Civil decorations of the United States and Category:Presidents of the United States, and that seems sufficient). Take a look at Category talk:Ribbon bars of the United States. Your input would be welcome.--Nyctc7 (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Wiki-black-with-text.jpg

Ciao, grazie per aver spolverato quello che era un vecchio test per una skin con lo sfondo nero; sono però curioso di vedere una tua versione jpeg 135x155 px di "migliore qualità", fino ad allora ti invito a non scrivere falsità. Grazie, LoStrangolatore (talk) 05:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Lascia perdere, scusa se sono apparso acido. Ho letto "poor quality" come "scadente", ed essendo palesemente falso, mi ha infastidito. Riconosco che posso fare immagini scadenti, ma non è questo il caso. Invece intendevi dire che ha meno dettagli, perché è piccola. Ho avuto l'illuminazione mentre scrivevo la risposta. Colpa mia. Comunque supporto la dr e prima ho scritto nero su bianco che sono favorevole.

A beneficio d'archivio e per tua conoscenza, annoto che lo scope dice "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed". Buone cose. LoStrangolatore (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag - Garnet with white bull.svg

File:Flag - Garnet with white bull.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Murray (talk) 14:08, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

File:The Military Bot Barnstar.svg

File:The Military Bot Barnstar.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Funfood ␌ 23:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

"Speedy"

It looks to me like you have been misusing {{Speedy}}. The tag should only be used in narrow circumstances, and should not be used in place of a deletion request listing-- Infrogmation (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Veneto.svg

File:Flag of Veneto.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

VernoWhitney (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Orbit of 274301 Wikipedia.svg

Hi! It seems you've placed Earth and Mars into the same orbit. Please, fix it. --A1 (talk) 10:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Bandiera della Sardegna

Ciao, ho visto che hai cambiato le mie modifiche a questa bandiera. Ho notato che l'hai fatta tu, ma non è realmente la bandiera della regione Sardegna che, come specifica il sito istituzionale, è questa. La tua versione ha una testa di moro simile (se non uguale) a quella della Corsica.--Carnby (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Non era mia intenzione dire che si trattava di una versione "sbagliata", ma semplicemente che la priorità nei vari progetti wiki dovesse essere data alla versione più simile a quella che si trova sul sito istituzionale. Se poi qualcuno decide di usare la tua versione anche solo su qualche pagina, non ci sono problemi.--Carnby (talk) 09:27, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

File:1530 logo.svg

File:1530 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ricordisamoa 20:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg

File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

204.197.232.5 00:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Claritas (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trycatch (talk) 11:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kaldari (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SethAllen623 (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

A heads-up

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 22:57, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Hip Hop Icon usage

Hi... nice Hp Hop icon! Am I able to use it for an article of clothing I am designing? Thanks! >Oliver

Yes you can! But you must attribute the icon to the author. And then, please write a link to the article here. ;-)

Best regards. --Angelus^(talk) 14:36, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Republic of Ragusa CoA

Hello. I have noticed that you are the author of the Ragusa/Dubrovnik Republic CoA. First I must say it looks really nice, however the colors are wrong. The CoA should actually be barry of 8 lines gules and argent, not gules and azure. You see the CoA of the republic was the same one Arpady dynasty of Hungary used. The same one city of Dubrovnik uses to this day. It was given to the republic in 1358-1360s when the Republic of Ragusa accepted suzerainty of King Louis I. In the contract which they signed with the king they obliged they will use his flag or CoA. The same CoA was later considered a sign of their sovereignty. You have probably been inspired by most famous version of the law book (or whatever it's called in English) which was restored in 1956 where they wrongly colored the lines in blue. The CoA in that book indeed contained blue but they were decorative templates within the white lines to emphasize the white/silver color as it was common in that time. Due to deterioration of the paper and the ink they thought the color was completely blue....without due research...yes they were idiots. You can see that the proper colors are indeed white and red in these examples: Doors of the Sponza palace (seat of the Republic's govt. til it's abolition by Napoleon [2], CoA preserved in the state archive museum in Dubrovnik [3], documents of Ragusan consul kept in Portugal (clearly shows red and white lines) [4], In his book Copioso ristretto degli annali di Rausa Giacomo Di Pietro Luccari describes the state emblem/coa of arms of Ragusa as the one of Hungary (page 155), red and white lines [5]. Etc, etc. Shokatz (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Rollbacker and reviewer logo

Hi Angelus, I imagine a lot of people say this, but thank you for creating the icons for user rights. I was wondering if you would be able to design a logo which includes both the rollback and reviewer symbol, since (on enwiki anyway) reviewer and rollbacker are generally held together? Regards, Callanecc (talk) 03:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-admin.png

Hello, I'm asking both you and User talk:Dragons flight#File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-admin.png in hopes that one of you can change File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-admin.png since it is based on both of your works put together (basically it's the enwp logo with mop and text). Thanks a bunch! Technical 13 (talk) 13:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 06:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Napoli metropolitana linea 1.png

File:Napoli metropolitana linea 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 10:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Napoli metropolitana linea 1 & linea 6.png

File:Napoli metropolitana linea 1 & linea 6.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 18:46, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Napoli metropolitana linea 1.png

File:Napoli metropolitana linea 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 18:46, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Mappa metropolitana Napoli zona 1.png

File:Mappa metropolitana Napoli zona 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Silver medal Commonwealth.svg and File:Bronze medal Commonwealth.svg

File:Gold medal commonwealth.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Avenue (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Metro Napoli-Model copy.png

File:Metro Napoli-Model copy.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Metro Napoli-Arcobaleno.png

File:Metro Napoli-Arcobaleno.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Italian police insignia

Hi Angelus, I would like to thank you for uploading a lot of missing Italian police rank insignia. It would be really great if you could also add some more insignia to the Category:Italian firefighters insignia. Thank you for your work. Take care. -- Janas1912 (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Piazza Garibaldi before 1960.jpg

Ciao Angelus, potresti (far) capovolgere orizzontalmente questa foto? Il senso è al contrario. Grazie mille!--CityClass (talk) 16:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Si, esattamente.--CityClass (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Medicine Barnstar

Hi! I love the original Barnstar, and wish there was one for medicine! Can you create one?? Bakerstmd (talk) 04:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

logo wikisordia

ciao come va?? ho notato che hai fatto una nuova versione.. grazie ancora per il logo ;) --SurdusVII (talk) 21:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

ciao perchè questo non si vede?? --SurdusVII (talk) 11:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC) PS:hai dimenticato di firmare :D :D

è possibile trasferirlo o meno il file su Commons?? --SurdusVII (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

già fatto!! --SurdusVII (talk) 13:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please stop your deletion requests immidiately. That a file is unused and/or there are alternatives with better resolution is not a reason for deletion. Commons is a image repository. --Matthiasb (talk) 22:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism???? Commons is a image repository, but not an "image hosting site"! If an image is superseded it may be nominated for deletion (according to the Commons guidelines)! So the fact that a file is unused and/or there are alternatives with better resolution IS a reason for a deletion request! Regards. --Angelus^(talk) 22:31, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

• For the rest of the conversation please see here

Revert

It is allowed per Policy to remove borders, pleas stop editwarring. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

It was not a editwar. I didn't know. Could you link me the guideline page or discussion about? Thanks.

Moreover I uploaded a retouched version without border, separatly. --Angelus^(talk) 12:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please see this:

Removing parts of historical images. For instance, historical engravings often have a border, and text describing the image under the image. If it was part of the original composition, and you want to remove it for some use on Wikimedia sites, upload it as a new file.

The text that you have cut falls in this category... --Angelus^(talk) 12:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

The part you have removed is not a simple "white border", it contains a text that describe the image and it is important for historical purpose. The cropped image should be upload separatly! --Angelus^(talk) 12:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

• For the rest of the conversation please see here & here.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adolf Hitler as a child..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope must point to the categrory that contains the image not on an encyclopedia page. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done :-) --Angelus^(talk) 12:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Gioconda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I really don't see what all the fuss is about. --Mattbuck 21:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Old paintings

Hello,

Please do not nominate old paintings for deletion. Please read {{PD-Art}}. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

• For the rest of the conversation please see here

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Bleached out images

Angelus, what are you doing to the Leonardo paintings, in order to bleach them out, like that?

• Your image of "La Gioconda.jpg", which I see has been promoted to valued image, has had all the blue bleached out of the background, and her face has turned greyish, instead of having the warm glowing tone.
• Similarly, your image of the "Leonardo Da Vinci - Vergine delle Rocce (Louvre).jpg" has been colour-adjusted so that it no longer resembles the painting itself. And you appear to have repaired some damage.

Are you going to tell me that the Louvre has recently cleaned all the blue out of the sky in the Mona Lisa, and has scrubbed the Virgin of the Rocks so thoroughly that it is now a pale shadow of what it was? Please tell me that you did it digitally! If this has been done by real so-called "restorers", then I am going to cry!

If you have high-definition pre-adjusted states for these pictures, please upload them.

Amandajm (talk) 08:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Alcide de Gasperi.jpg

File:Alcide de Gasperi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Silver star.png

File:Silver star.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

About The Dragon Zodiac Picture

Hey, I'm a musician and my next album's title's going to be "Year of the Dragon". Right now I'm designing the cover picture, and I was paying attention to the file you've uploaded at the Dragon Zodiac page.

According to the permission details, I do can remix the picture, but can't add Text (And I need to add the album's name). So, first of all, are you the original owner of the pic? If you do, what kind of use can I do with this pic? If you don't, do you know how can I contact him?

Thanks a lot!

File:UEFA Futsal Cup.png

File:UEFA Futsal Cup.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 10:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

File:GERMAN TROOPS ADVANCING PAST ABANDONED AMERICAN EQUIPMENT.jpg

File:GERMAN TROOPS ADVANCING PAST ABANDONED AMERICAN EQUIPMENT.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Diannaa (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg

Hello, I noticed a problem with this file. The mops lighting is wrong. It should be flipped. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 11:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Freddie Mercury signature 2.svg

Sorry Angelus, but isn’t the signature copyrighted by the heirs of Freddie Mercury? --Ousia (talk) 21:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Used your zodiac svg's on a website thanks attributed them to you

https://horoscope.killenergybills.com/daily-chinese — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.56.22.4 (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:UEFA Futsal Cup 2.png

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

1500 m start signs in the picture added to athletic

Hi Angelus, only a question about the subject. Are you sure that the signs of start of 1500 m are right? BR,

Illepak

the picture of the coin

hello,

i would like to know if you know where that coin is fro exactly and around what time period.

thank you, you can email me at nicole.suchar31@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.140.81.243 (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apple Computer Logo rainbow.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 00:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Donald Duck hat icon.svg

File:Donald Duck hat icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 08:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikipedia Administrator.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Asteraceae radiation.png

File:Asteraceae radiation.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 17:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Assassin's Creed logo.svg

File:Assassin's Creed logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

92.187.226.91 00:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Fregi

Fregi Carabinieri

Buongiorno Angelus, ti volevo chiedere visto che te hai inserito la fiamma ai vari ruoli. Siccome la nuova fiamma degli Appuntanti Scelti Qualifica Speciale una fiamma a 13 punte argentata, quella dei Brigadieri Capo Qualifica Speciale e dorata a 13 punte, sarebbe da modificare. Perché non mettere anche i soggoli? Attenzione che mi è capitato di vedere i soggoli di alcuni Vice Brigadieri diversi sia nei tg che su internet, attualmente ci sono dei soggoli diversi e gli ho visti su alcune pagine di facebook. Ti vorrei inviare le immagini così da poter vedere e verificate te stesso. Ma non si può a quanto pare. Comunque se puoi modificarli. In futuro come ho detto volendo si possono mettere affianco o sotto la fiamma i vari soggoli così sarebbe perfetto. Grazie. Maestoso Maestoso (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:BlankMap-World-v2.png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BlankMap-World-v2.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Fæ (talk) 12:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

New image

@ANGELUS: , hi, I have created a new 'Wikipedia Rollback image' in gif format using files [[File:Wikipedia_Logo_Puzzle_Globe_Spins_Horizontally,_Revealing_The_Contents_Of_All_Of_Its_Puzzle_Pieces_Without_Background.gif]] and [[File:Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg]] on my mobile. Can I upload it on 'Wikimedia Commons' ? If yes, what description, copyright etc should I have to write on it, kindly reply. -संतोष गोरे (talk) 06:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

with duplicates

Hi. Please do not remove templates from files when you are nominating them for deletion. It is problematic in the comparison and the updating of information. Also to note that we do not replace existing files as duplicate just because you have uploaded a new copy with a new name. The older file will typically always be the one retained.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

parere wikicollega

ciao, wikicollega, come stai?? ho bisogno di un tuo parere di questo e di quest'altro.. --SurdusVII 15:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

ipotesi PdC di immagini fake

ciao, come stai, wikicollega?? ho un forte dubbio e vorrei segnalare che queste immagini sono dei fake, cioè falsi e che non si trovano da nessuna parte in questo sito web del presunto microstato non riconosciuto.. pertanto è possibile avviare le PdC per questi file?? SurdusVII 07:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Plexitube.jpg

ciao, wikicollega, come stai?? come posso segnalare in quest'immagine il C4?? SurdusVII 17:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)